Description:
This book argues that legal persuasion results from making and breaking mental connections. It follows a cognitive science roadmap while the authors test the directions through rhetorical analysis. This blend of rhetorical analysis and cognitive science yields a new way of seeing and understanding legal persuasion.
Review Quotes:
'The book's greatest strength lies in its stimulating and provocative examples. Readers are treated to a host of insights from cognitive science, culture high and low, the rough-and-tumble world of litigation, and the lofty perches of appellate advocacy and judging.'
Ross Guberman, Author, Point Made: How to Write Like the Nation's Top Advocates and President, Legal Writing Pro
'Professors Berger and Stanchi have combined their respective interests in rhetorical theory and cognitive science to produce an extremely engaging book about legal persuasion. This volume will be immensely helpful to advocates, but it also provides scholars with concrete examples that illuminate and advance deep insights.'
Francis J. Mootz III, Dean and Professor of Law, McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific, USA
'Every law student, law teacher, attorney, judge, and - dare I say politician? - should read Berger and Stanchi's brilliant new synthesis of rhetorical theory and cognitive science. Both accessible and sophisticated, its clear succinct explanations and examples will help you think more clearly, advocate more effectively, and decide more wisely.'
Kate O'Neill, Professor Emeritus, University of Washington School of Law, USA
'Two powerhouse legal scholars connect their expertise in cognitive science and rhetoric to reveal deep insights into effective persuasion. Filled with examples and case studies from recent and familiar judicial decisions, the book makes complex concepts accessible to students, judges, and lawyers.'
Suzanne Rowe, James L. and llene R. Hershner Professor, University of Oregon School of Law, USA