Description: In the first book-length study of the imperial history of extradition in Hong Kong, Ivan Lee shows how British judges, lawyers, and officials navigated the nature of extradition, debated its legalities, and distinguished it over time from other modalities of criminal jurisdiction - including deportation, rendition, and trial and punishment under territorial and extraterritorial laws. These complex debates were rooted in the contested legal status of Chinese subjects under the Opium War treaties of 1842-43. They also intersected wider shifts and tensions in British ideas of territorial sovereignty, criminal justice and procedure, and the legal rights and liabilities of British subjects and alien persons in British territory. By the 1870s, a new area of imperial law emerged as Britain incorporated a frontier colony into an increasingly territorial and legally homogenous empire. This important perspective revises our understanding of the legal origins of colonial Hong Kong and British imperialism in China.
Brief description: Ivan Lee is Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Law at the National University of Singapore. His research centres on the history of ideas and practices of criminal law, jurisdiction, and procedure in the British Empire.
Review Quotes: 'This important study of the complex foundations of British rule offers fascinating new insights into the contentious issues of sovereignty, nationality and jurisdiction that were to recur throughout Hong Kong's history. These issues converged in Hong Kong's unusual approach to extradition, which, Lee argues, both influenced and interacted with emerging policies elsewhere in the British Empire.' Christopher Munn, author of Anglo-China: Chinese People and British Rule in Hong Kong 1841-1880