Description: Rereading Fluency is an important and timely book. The authors do not just criticize current policies and practices but offer alternatives for improving the quality of reading assessment and instruction. Richard L. Allington Has your school spent tens of thousands or more dollars on fluency-based reading assessment programs? If so, you might be getting less for your investment than you think. Did you know?
- There is little consensus on what exactly fluency is.
- The NRPs reportthe basis for Reading Firstfailed to support its assertion that it is generally acknowledged that fluency is a critical component of skilled reading.
- The relationship between fluency and comprehension may be vastly overstated by the conventional wisdom?
- Faster, more accurate readers arent always better comprehenders.
- Decoding rates are highly variable among readers with similar comprehension levels.
- Commercial, phonics-based programs do not result in better decoding, faster and more accurate reading, or better comprehension.
- Performance on fluency assessments says little if anything about students ability to read and understand literature.
Brief description:
Bess Altwerger is the author or editor of three books with Heinemann: ReReading Fluency (2007), Reading for Profit (2005), and Whole Language: What's the Difference? (1990). She is Professor of Elementary Education and Graduate Reading at Towson University. Bess has worked to develop critical literacy pedagogies that prepare students to build a more just, democratic, and sustainable future. Her current activies are devoted to transforming repressive literacy policies, reprofessionalizing teaching, and returning joy to classrooms.