Description:
Doubting Thomas presents a deep analysis of four key debates between Aquinas and his contemporaries, offering a fresh perspective on behalf of the saint's major critics.
While Thomas Aquinas remains by far the most influential philosopher and theologian of the Middle Ages, many of his contemporaries considered him a dangerous innovator whose enthusiasm for the newly rediscovered Aristotle at points led him astray. Some theologians of the Franciscan Order, especially, were vocal critics of his thought.
In Doubting Thomas, Brendan W. Case examines four interrelated critiques of Aquinas leveled by Franciscan theologians Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and his student Peter John Olivi over the nature of human knowledge, the proper way to understand how unity and trinity relate in God, the nature of time, and the nature of matter and its relation to spiritual beings. By arguing that the Franciscans had the better of Aquinas in each of these debates, Case offers a much-needed corrective to the one-sided focus on Aquinas's thought in recent theology and philosophy.
Brief description:
Brendan W. Case is the associate director for research of the Human Flourishing Program at Harvard University, and the author of The Justification of the Sinless: On Supralapsarian Christology and the Goodness of the Incarnation and The Accountable Animal: Justice, Justification, and Judgment.
Review Quotes:
"This book is masterfully written, and it is a must-read for anyone interested in Christian dogmatics. Case offers a highly worthwhile retrieval of Bonaventure and his early followers, constructively criticizing various positions taken by Aquinas." --Matthew Levering, author of Aquinas's Eschatological Ethics and the Virtue of Temperance