Description:
A fresh examination of political representation in an era of negative partisanship.
What does representation look like when politicians focus on "othering" the opposing party rather than the policy interests of their constituents? How do voters react to negative partisan rhetoric? And is policy responsiveness still the cornerstone of American representative democracy?
In How Politicians Polarize, Mia Costa draws on survey experiments, analysis of congressional newsletters and tweets, and data on fundraising and media coverage to examine how and why politicians rely so often on negative partisan attacks. Costa shows that most Americans do not like negative rhetoric, and politicians know this. Nonetheless, these kinds of attacks can reap powerful rewards from national media, donors, and party elites. Costa's findings challenge the popular notion that Americans are motivated more by their partisan identities than by policy representation. Her research illuminates how the political ecosystem rewards negative representation and how this affects the quality of American democracy.
Brief description: Mia Costa is assistant professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth College, where she is also faculty associate in the Program in Quantitative Social Science. She has published articles in American Journal of Political Science, Politics & Gender, Political Research Quarterly, and Political Behavior, among others.
Review Quotes: "Presently, politicians, activists, and social media figures appear to endlessly exchange negative views of those with whom they disagree. The degree of negativity discourages many about the state of politics. Many claim that politics should focus more on substantive policy differences. But why does this negativity occur, and is it what politicians and voters want? This remarkably thorough analysis seeks to answer these questions. . . . A very well-done and invaluable study."-- "Choice"